City Rating Methodology

Open, inclusive, diverse cities are more competitive: they encourage innovation, they attract high-skilled workers, and they are better at growing high-value businesses.

A comprehensive look at what makes cities open, inclusive, and competitive.

LGBTQ+ inclusion sends a clear signal that a city is an open, progressive and dynamic place to do business.

This report presents a broad base of data that supports these assertions. It covers a wide range of questions about cities: how easy is to do business? How “network ready” is the city? Is it corruption-free? Is there a healthy “innovation ecosystem”? What is the quality of living like? Are LGBTQ+ people welcome, and what is their legal status?

We have synthesized this data into the Open For Business City Ratings. It combines 27 individual indicators from a number of well-respected data sources to produce a picture of which cities are open, progressive and competitive – and which are not.

For policymakers

seeking to boost the economic performance of their city, the index can help them to benchmark their performance against competing cities.

For businesses

considering possible new locations for offices or operations, the index can help evaluate differences between cities.

For individuals

thinking about relocating to another city, the index can help them to think about what they are looking for and how they might fit in.

Methodology in detail

METHODOLOGY

  • The purpose of the ratings is to combine economic factors with elements that measure inclusion of the LGBTQ+ community in a city. The 2020 City Ratings were used as the starting point to preserve as much consistency as possible, to enable comparisons over time. A handful of data sources used in the 2020 City Ratings were not updated due to various reasons. In this case, we identified an acceptable substitute that would create as much comparability as possible. The ratings model is split into two main categories: economic competitiveness and LGBTQ+ inclusiveness.

  • The team created a list of cities that would be included in the ratings. Cities were chosen based on which were included in all selected datasets. To avoid skewing the index in favour of any geography, only a maximum of 5 cities are included per country. The exception is the United States, which includes 10 cities. This is due to the size of the US economy and population. In the 2025 edition, we added four new cities: Kigali, Kampala, Krakow and Bridgetown, as Open for Business has operating programmes in all of them. The final list includes 149 cities.

  • The next step is to standardize the data to a scale of 1 to 10 to create a comprehensive output to compare each city. The following equation normalizes each individual indicator in which it was better to have a high score:

    Observed Outcome Rescaled = (Observed outcome - lowest outcome / Highest outcome - lowest outcome) x10

    And for each individual indicator in which it was better to have a low score, the following equation was used:

    Observed Outcome Rescaled = 1 - (Observed outcome - lowest outcome / Highest outcome - lowest outcome) x 10

    This normalisation methodology was adopted from Opportunity Nation’s 2016 Opportunity Index.

    Once the data was normalized to a 10-point scale, the arithmetic mean of the scores across all included cities was calculated. If the mean was below 3.0, the “Highest Outcome” variable above was substituted with the 90th percentile value. All cities with values higher than the 90th percentile received a “10” for that metric. If the mean was above 7.0, the “Lowest Outcome” variable above was substituted with the 10th percentile value. All cities with values lower than the 10th percentile received a “0” for that metric. This was to ensure sufficient variation in values to differentiate cities on each individual indicator.

  • Once the City Ratings 2025 were finalised, the research team conducted a series of interviews with regional experts to fully understand the context and nuances of each region. The main narrative and analysis of the report was peer-reviewed by Open for Business’s Research Advisory Board.

  • Each of the two categories are equally weighted as 50% of the overall score. Each individual indicator weight is available in the table below.

  • Once each city had a composite 10-point score (10 being the highest, 0 the lowest), it was awarded a rating, similar to a credit rating. The purpose of rating cities instead of ranking them is to not dictate a definitive ranking on each city. We understand that there is no one-size-fits all approach to city competitiveness. Additionally, we want the ratings to start a conversation on the various components that make a city a good place to do inclusive business – something that will be easier to do without focusing on the minutiae of weightings and scores.

Individual indicators and weightings

METHODOLOGY

Economic Competitiveness

Economic Performance is comprised of tree indicators that approximate a city’s wealth, its home nation’s wealth and competitiveness.

Metric Level of Data Source Year Description Weight
City GDP Per Capita City Oxford Economics Global Cities Index 2023 City-level nominal GDP per capita data is sourced from the Oxford Economics Global Cities Index. 6.00%
Economic Resilience National FM Global Resilience Index 2024 The FM Global Resilience Index is the only tool that compiles economic, supply chain and risk quality data on nearly 130 countries to evaluate resilience around the world. 8.00%
City GDP growth City Oxford Economics Global Cities Index 2024 Annual city-level GDP growth rates (%, constant prices) are taken from the Oxford Economics Global Cities Index. 6.00%

Innovation is comprised of two indicators that approximate a city’s and its home nation’s potential for innovation

Metric Level of Data Source Year Description Weight
City innovation potential City 2thinknow 2023 This metric is a measure of a city's potential for innovation, as determined by 2thinknow's Innovation Cities Index. There are 500 cities analyzed and ranked. The index uses 188 quantitative and qualitative indicators. 10.0%
National innovation potential National World Intellectual Property Organization 2024 The Global Innovation Index combines 81 indicators exploring a broad vision of innovation, including political environment, education, infrastructure and business sophistication. It measures the innovation potential of 81 indicators. 10.0%

Business Environment is comprised of five indicators that approximate how supportive a city is for businesses to flourish

Metric Level of Data Source Year Description Weight
FDI inflows per capita National World Investment Report (UNCTAD) 2023 This metric measures how much foreign direct investment flowed into a country in 2023. It is a measure of how attractive the country is to foreign investment and capital. The value is divided by the national population to normalize the values. 5.75%
Networked readiness National Portulans Institute 2023 The Network Readiness Index is a composite index constructed with three levels. The primary level consists of four pillars that make up the fundamental dimensions of network readiness. Each of the fundamental pillars divides into additional sub-pillars that constitute the second level. The third level consists of individual indicators distributed across the different sub-pillars and pillars of the primary and secondary levels. All indicators used within the NRI belong to a pillar and a sub-pillar. 4.75%
% Tradable Services of GDP National World Bank 2023 Tradable services as a percentage of GDP measures the share of GDP generated by exportable service sectors, including retail, transport, finance, and tourism. This indicator reflects the importance of tradable services in economic diversification and international competitiveness. 4.75%
Strength of auditing and reporting standards National World Competitiveness Ranking (IMD), Global Competitiveness Index (WEF) 2024/2020 The 2024 IMD World Competitiveness Ranking's question "Auditing and accounting practices are adequately implemented in business". This is meant to measure the robustness of internal standards, which improve ease of doing business. For those ccountries, where IMD data was unavailable, the WEF Global Competitiveness Index (2020) results on auditing and reporting standards were used. 4.75%

Human Capital is comprised of four indicators that approximate a city’s level of education and proclivity to attract skilled individuals.

Metric Level of Data Source Year Description Weight
Quality of living City Mercer 2023 The Mercer Quality of Living Survey evaluates quality of living based on data from 231 cities on 39 factors including political, economic, environmental, personal safety, health, education, transportation and other public services. 5.00%
Inflow of university students National UNESCO 2023 The total inflow of students attending university in a certain country. This measures the openness of a country to foreigners and the quality of a country's higher education institutions. 5.00%
Years of schooling National World Bank / UNESCO 2023 Average number of completed years of education of a country’s population aged 25 years and older, excluding years spent repeating individual grades. 5.00%
Number of top 500 universities per capita National Times Higher Education 2024 The number of universities ranked in the top 500 universities in the world by Times Higher Education, divided by a country’s population which comes from the World Bank. 5.00%

Entrepreneurship is comprised of three indicators that approximate a city’s level of entrepreneurial activity and how supportive its home nation is of new businesses.

Metric Level of Data Source Year Description Weight
Ease of starting a business National Business Ready report (World Bank), Doing Business Report (World Bank) 2024/2020 Countries are scored on a scale from 0 to 100 based on their ease of business entry for local firms. The assessment evaluates 65 indicators across three dimensions: regulatory framework, public services, and operational efficiency. 6.67%
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Adult Population Survey National Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2023 Response to the survey question "You would not start a business for fear it might fail" (% of those agreeing there are good opportunities locally) This is meant to measure the popular attitudes toward entrepreneurship. 6.67%
Number of companies headquartered City Crunchbase 2024 Crunchbase is a knowledge platform for investors, companies, researchers, and journalists. It compiles a database of companies that are based in each city around the world, drawn from input from 3400 global investment firms and a large community of executives, entrepreneurs, and investors. 6.67%

LGBTQ+ Inclusion

Social Attitudes is comprised of four indicators that approximate a city’s and its home nation’s attitudes toward LGBTQ+ people. The Williams Institute’s Global Acceptance Index is used as a national indicator of attitudes and their trend over time.

Metric Level of Data Source Year Description Weight
LGBTQI+ Perception Index (GBPI) National F&M Global Barometer 2022 The GBPI asks six basic questions on personal safety, safety in gathering, acceptance, discrimination, fear of police, and violence. Respondents complete the survey via the Internet and choose answers on a Likert scale from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). 12.5%
Change in Global Acceptance Index (GAI) National Williams Institute 2020 The percent change in the Global Acceptance Index (GAI) from 2000 to 2020. 12.5%
Trans Murder Rates National Trans Murder Monitoring research project/Statista 2024 Estimated national murder rate for trans people. 12.5%
Political supportiveness City Municipality websites, media outlets 2024 A measure of how supportive the city government is of the LGBT+ community. The score looks at if LGBT+ resources are available on a city’s website, if there is an LGBT+ advisory committee, if a city official has made a positive statement in public, and if the city has a pride parade that takes place without government restriction. 12.5%